We’re now in the midst of the “third wave” of electricity industry reform in California. The first was in the early 1980s with the rise of independently-owned cogeneration and renewable resources. Mixed with increased energy efficiency, that led to a surplus of power in the late 1990s, which in turn created the push for restructuring and deregulation. Unfortunately, poorly designed markets and other factors precipitated the 2000-01 energy crisis. The rise of renewables and distributed resources is pushing a third wave that may change the industry even more fundamentally.
I wrote a paper in 2002 on how I viewed the history of California’s electricity industry through 2001 and presented this at a conference. (It hasn’t yet been published.) I identify some different factors for why the energy crisis erupted, and what lessons we might learn for this next wave.
Pingback: The real lessons from California’s 2000-01 electricity crisis and what they mean for today’s markets | Economics Outside the Cube
Pingback: Are PG&E’s customers about to walk? | Economics Outside the Cube
Pingback: Understanding core facts before moving forward with NEM reform | Economics Outside the Cube
Pingback: A misguided perspective on California’s rooftop solar policy | Economics Outside the Cube
Pingback: Is the NASDAQ water futures market transparent enough? | Economics Outside the Cube
Pingback: PG&E’s bankruptcy—what’s happened and what’s next? | Economics Outside the Cube
Pingback: California already paid for utility assets once: Why do we have to do it again? | Economics Outside the Cube